翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Freeman's Marsh ・ Freeman, Hardy and Willis ・ Freeman, Illinois ・ Freeman, Indiana ・ Freeman, Langlade County, Wisconsin ・ Freeman, Mercer County, West Virginia ・ Freeman, Missouri ・ Freeman, South Dakota ・ Freeman, Upshur County, West Virginia ・ Freeman, Virginia ・ Freeman, West Virginia ・ Freeman, Wisconsin ・ Freeman-Brewer-Sawyer House ・ Freeman-Felker House ・ Freeman-Maloy v Marsden ・ Freeman-Walter-Abele Test ・ Freemanbreen ・ Freemaniana ・ Freemanichthys thompsoni ・ Freemans ・ Freemans Bay ・ Freemans Reach, New South Wales ・ Freemans Waterhole, New South Wales ・ Freemans, Antigua and Barbuda ・ Freemansburg ・ Freemansburg, Pennsylvania ・ Freemansburg, West Virginia ・ Freemansundet ・ Freemantle ・ Freemantle F.C. Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Freeman-Walter-Abele Test ： ウィキペディア英語版 Freeman-Walter-Abele Test ''Freeman-Walter-Abele'' is a now outdated judicial test in United States patent law. It came from three decisions of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals—''In re Freeman'',〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= In re Freeman )〕 573 F.2d 1237 (C.C.P.A. 1978), ''In re Walter'', 618 F.2d 758 (C.C.P.A. 1980);〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= In re Walter )〕 and ''In re Abele'', 684 F.2d 902 (C.C.P.A. 1982) 〔(【引用サイトリンク】title= In re Abele )〕—which attempted to comply with then-recent decisions of the Supreme Court concerning software-related patent claims. ==Overview== The test was used to determine whether a patent claim was directed entirely to mathematical principles or algorithms, which are not patentable subject matter. The aim of the test was to allow claims that do not attempt to monopolize traditionally patent ineligible subject matter, such as mathematics, thinking, and laws of nature. Though primarily concerned with mathematical algorithms the test has some applicability in all subject matter discussions. Its use peaked in 1994 with ''In re Schrader''. Its use then faded, to be replaced by the now also superseded "useful, concrete, and tangible result" test of ''In re Alappat''. The current legal test for patent eligibility is stated in the Supreme Court's decisions in ''Bilski v. Kappos'', ''Mayo v. Prometheus'', and ''Alice v. CLS Bank''. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Freeman-Walter-Abele Test」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.